Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:01:05.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

H. J. Rose
H. J. Rose
Affiliation:
St. Andrews University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , September 1934 , pp. 126 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Incidentally, that principle was not left for Tischendorf to enunciate; Wetstein, in his edition of the New Testament, Vol. ii, p. 859 (Amsterdam, 1752), says: Inter duas uariantes Lectiones, siquae, est εφωνττρος (sic) aut planior aut Graecantior, alteri non protinus praeferenda est, sed contra saepius: and proceeds to give sound reasons for his dictum.

3 C.R., xlvii (1933), p. 216.Google Scholar