No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Two Footnotes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00217952/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00217952a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1964
References
1 Dio (liv. 3. 4) records the conspiracy under 22, but scholars have proposed 23 in view of the entry for that year in the Fasti Capitolini. The matter is still controversial: cf. J. P. V. D. Balsdon, Gnomon, xxxiii (1961), 395.
2 Aly, op. cit., p. 112, col. 2, line 38.