Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:13:48.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tradition of Ovid's Amores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

E. J. Kenney
E. J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1955 , pp. 13 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Amores, ed. Munari, F., Florence, , 1951, p. xviiiGoogle Scholar, and cf. Lee, A. G. in C.R., n.s. ii, p. 175Google Scholar.

2 Cf. Tafel, S., Die Uberlieferungsgeschichte von Ovids Carmina Amatoria verfolgt bis zum 11.Jahrhtmdert, Tübingen, 1910, pp. 26–28Google Scholar.

3 A.A. i. 466–71 are omitted by RO and Rent. 189 f. (homoeoarchon) by R, which is there the sole representative of its class.

4 This preposterous notion, which scarcely merits refutation, was propounded by e.g. Lenz, , Parerga Ovidiana, p. 72Google Scholar. It is perhaps worth pointing out that the extra conscius at ii. 2. 18 was, artistically considered, a superfluity which a forger of such extraordinary, not to say anachronistic, brilliance would surely have avoided.

5 As examples of verses which, considered on their merits, are to be classed as interpola-tions I instance A.A. i. 395 f., Am. i. 13. 31 f.