No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 The objection is fatal to the editor in the particular place where he makes it (56 D.). The one sentence in which he gets near the words to be explained, he has had to withdraw in an erratum. Doubtless he saw it had involved him in an elementary mathematical mistake.
2 In this connexion it may be noticed that the consideration by which the editor thinks he can ‘dispose of Zeller's theory of particulars immanent in the ideas’ only shows a misunderstanding of the problem. Zeller was quite aware of this consideration and many like it, as appears at once from this part of his account of Plato.