^{page 192 note 1} νεμ⋯σεις ὑποκριτ⋯ν in Hesychius and Photius.—Rees, p. 18.

^{page 192 note 2} Excluding the Rhesus, according to the now common but dubious opinion, as a work of the fourth century, and possibly not meant for performance.

^{page 192 note 1} This example has been recently pointed out in some English publication. To my vexation, I have lost and cannot recover the reference. Will any one supply it? To the same speaker belongs apparently v. 847, for which no speaker can be found in the ordinary cast.

^{page 192 note 2} In P. 19. Note I, for Phoenissae read Phoenix.

^{page 192 note 3} University of Chicago Press, 1908. Pp. 144. Price $1.06.