No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 Subsequent to writing the last paragraph, I notice that Lindsay, in his note on Capt. 896 perhaps advances the same explanation in the following words: it (mantiscinor) is formed on the pattern of uaticinor, lenodnor, patrocinor, ratiocinor, etc., though uaticinor, does not, like the other examples, exhibit an ostensible nominative in composition.
2 Be it remarked in passing that lurcinabundut: lurco ‘glutton’ may be accounted a normal formation from the stem lurein- (cf. termo, stems termōn/terminterminus; homo, stem homin-).