No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 194 note 1 This is proved by Livy xxxi. 49 and 50; cf. xxxiii. 42.
page 194 note 2 Golden Bough, vol. i. ch. 2, section 1.
page 194 note 3 Livy v. 52, 13. Even after Augustus' revival, the restriction was almost as severe; Tac. Ann. iii. 71.
page 194 note 4 Caesar's predecessor in the priesthood, Merula, had been also consul; see Drumann, iii. 130.
page 195 note 1 Livy xxxi. 50.
page 195 note 2 See also the Lex incerta reperta Bantiae, lines 16, 17.
page 195 note 3 Livy xxxix. 39; a chapter worth attentive study for other reasons. The identity of the C. Valerius Flaccus here mentioned seems to be established; Livy expressly says that he was Flamen Dialis.
page 195 note 4 Val. Max. vi. 9, 2.
page 195 note 5 For full details, see Marquardt, , Staatsverualtung (ed. Wissowa, ), iii. 328, 336 foll.Google Scholar
page 195 note 6 Cf. Plutarch, , Quaest. Rom. 113.Google Scholar
page 195 note 7 Livy xl. 42; on this occasion the tribes decided in favour of the Pontifex Maximus. A mutilated passage in Festus (p. 343) seems to show that the appeal might be successful. See Mommsen, Slaatsrecht, i. 22, 30 note.