No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
1 The ‘organ-voice’ of Aeschylus, contrasted with the ‘chiselled clarity’ of Sophocles (p. 169), is happily a unique aberration.
2 See Waldock, A. J. A., Sophocles the Dramatist (Cambridge, 1951), ch. 2.Google Scholar
3 ‘Repugnance’ has gone, but ‘reluctance’ remains, in the same author's Sophocles: An Interpretation (Cambridge, 1980), p. 191.Google Scholar