Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:01:12.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Suggestions on Calpurnius Siculus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. P. Postgate
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , May 1901 , pp. 213 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1901

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 214 note 1 The corruption arose thus: inflat' was mistaken for infta tc and the abbreviation of tunc confused with that of nunc (nc).

page 214 note 2 I have Said that ‘hic raram’ and ‘manticoram’ may well have come from ‘adclinem’ by the route of ordinary corruptions, because it is by no means certain that these readings have not been patched up out of some MS gibberish by the aid of Pausanias. It is odd at the least that the very next section to the one I have quoted describes the Mantichoras.