^{page 37 note 1} It is tempting to call φιλειν non-Aeolic. But Sappho's δικει 1. 20 and ποθω 23, and καλω Et. Magn. 485. 45, coupled with the ictus-lengthening of ε in τεμνηος and τετραβαρων Alc. 152 and 153, and the Inscr. and (an ε-verb in Aeolic, cf. ) Alc. 43, point to the use of three forms corresponding to the Attic verbs in e.g. and the ictus-form of the latter, καλω. Theocritus' forms, therefore, 29. 19, 28. 14, 28. II, 29. 9, 29. 31, and here, are not necessarily to be condemned.

^{page 37 note 2} The New Fragments of Alcaeus Sappho and Corinna, Deighton Bell and Co., 1909.Google Scholar

^{page 38 note 1} Since this was set up in type I have learnt with regret of the death of this distinguished scholar.