^{page 8 note 1} My italics.

^{page 8 note 2} Kommentar zutn ersten Buck von X.s Memorabilien, Basel, , 1953 (Schweizerische Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft, v)Google Scholar.

^{page 8 note 3} My italics.

^{page 8 note 4} Tr. Marchant.

^{page 8 note 5} Tr. Marchant.

^{page 8 note 6} After the concluding remark there is a of a further brief encounter between Socrates and Antiphon, clearly a post scriptum.

^{page 9 note 1} Described as Socrates' συνου⋯α by Plato, , Symposium 173 bGoogle Scholar.

^{page 10 note 1} See Denniston, , Greek Particles, p. 463, ii (1)Google Scholar.

^{page 10 note 2} (cf. below). This appears to give the grounds for the association, in contrast to the ‘cash nexus’ in the proother kinds.

^{page 10 note 3} Surely in both cases we have Socratic εἰρωνε⋯α.

^{page 10 note 4} Taylor, , Plato, p. 225Google Scholar: ‘To all intents and purposes, we shall not go wrong by treating the “speech of Diotima” as a speech of phrase Socrates.’

^{page 10 note 5} If, as I believe, the opinion of ⋯μεῖς is identical with the doctrine of Socrates proother pounded in the succeeding sentence, there is corroboration for both in Plato, , Lysis 211 d ffGoogle Scholar.

^{page 11 note 1} Aus Platos Werdezeit, 1913, pp. 394 ff.

^{page 11 note 2} Plato, Theaet. 151 e, 152 a, 167 c.

^{page 11 note 3} Plato, , Symp. 181 aGoogle Scholar.

^{page 11 note 4} Bury, R. G., Symposium of Plato, 1909, p. xxviGoogle Scholar.