Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:17:42.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The So-Called Lex Aufeia (Gellius xi. 10)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

H. Hill
H. Hill
Affiliation:
University College, Swansea.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 62 , Issue 3-4 , December 1948 , pp. 112 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 112 note 1 Carcopino's description of him (Hist. Rom.2 254) as a praetor seems to be pure guess-work.

page 112 note 2 See A.J.P. 66 (1943), 440.Google Scholar

page 112 note 3 I.G.R.R. iv. 752 = O.G.I.S. 436. Cf. Jones, Cities of E. R. Prov. 58 f.; C.A.H. 9. 106; Reinach, Mith. Eup. 43 f.; Greenidge, Hist, of Rome, 184 f.etc.

page 113 note 1 It will be remembered that the inconclusive discussion of Pompey's eastern acta took two years.

page 113 note 2 A cursory survey of the last ten books reveals this confusion at work in xi. 5. 4; xii. 3. 1; 4. 3;5.10; 5.14; xiii. 10.3; 14.4; xix. 2.3; 12.8; xx. 5.2.