Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-j5c6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-10T09:32:25.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Six Conjectures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

M. Winterbottom
M. Winterbottom
Affiliation:
Worcester College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 1972 , pp. 11 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This note was written before the publication of a similar emendation by D. R. Shackleton Bailey in C.Q.lxiv (1970), 356; I hope that my fuller discussion has something to add.

2 It may (or may not) be relevant that the two Renaissance manuscripts B and C here read uoluptates.