^{page 192 note 1} One may now add di Benedetto, V., ‘Il proemio del Cinegetico di Senofonte’, Maia, xix (1967), 22 ff., 230 ff.Google Scholar

^{page 192 note 2} Breitenbach gives a very fair summary of the problem in R.E. ixa, 1913 ff.

^{page 192 note 3} My own view, which I have not space to argue here, is that the Σ-inversion is a clumsy expansion of A.

^{page 193 note 1} So by his own count (p. 37); but some 40 by my lists. Delebecque must not, however, claim ποσίτω (6. 6): Schneider ascribes it to Leunclavius.

^{page 193 note 2} ταῖς κυσίν (7. 10) and οὐκ ἐμποδών(9. 19) are two of his best conjectures: λίνοις (10. 7) for ϋιλῖς is a typical example of Dele-becque's over-confidence: it does not ex-plain why the nets are to be hung on strong trees.

^{page 193 note 3} Connoisseurs of circular arguments will be delighted by the notes at 3. 6 and 4. 3 designed to justify supplanting the harmless πλάνοøις with πλάνας.

^{page 193 note 4} There is a cross-reference from περίπτρος to a non-existent entry for σαρδών.