^{page 175 note 1} By a misprint M. Monceaux, p. 57, reads ϕιξ′. I may add that the reading φcan surely not be correct; the 517th pentaeteris means a lapse of 2065 years: should we not read ρις′ ? ϕ is sometimes mistaken for p, yet ϕις′ occurs twice (Wood, vi. 8 and 18). If correct it must refer to a mythical foundation of Ephesus as era.

^{page 176 note 1} A list was published I think by C. Babington in Num. Chron. many years ago ; but it is now incomplete and not generally accessible.

^{page 176 note 2} In such a reference M. Monceaux would confer a boon on all who do not possess the auszug by adding the further description Abhandl. Sächs. Gesellseh. 1861.

^{page 177 note 1} I owe the reference to Mr. Head : M. Monceaux quotes Pinder's article from the Abhandl. 1856 instead of 1855. Marquardt says ‘Pinder hat diesen Cistophorus übersehen,’ an example of the danger of Correcting a specialist in his own subject.

^{page 177 note 2} Papers of Amer. School at Athens, ii. p. 333 : also published with a different but equally false restoration in Bull. Corr. hell. 1886, p. 455.