No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 174 note 1 This suggestion, the only real novelty which G. offers, is untenable despite the analogy of 2, 48, 3 : it strains τ σαφς σκοπεῖν, and if T. did not mean τν μελλντων to be future in relation to his readers as well as to himself, he expressed his meaning with criminal obscurity. The passage is correctly explained by Shilleto.
page 175 note 1 G. passes lightly over this clause : he appears (pp. 40, 99) to interpret τ δοντα as said from the standpoint of Thucydides, which I think impossible.