^{page 12 note 14} Circumstances are almost identical in 599a, except that there a few letters in A can now be read to make sense; see C.R. lvi (1962), 120.

^{page 13 note 1} Ritschl, Opusc. ii. 487 f.; Ritschl's observation that the omission of esse would be against Plautine usage is a little questionable, and is certainly not applicable here since an esse in line 603a may have served for 604 as well.

^{page 13 note 2} This point is rightly insisted upon by Frei, P., Die Flexion griechischer Namen der ersten Deklination im Latein, Winterthur, 1958, p. 22.Google Scholar