^{page 211 note 1} Of the two parallels cited, Herodotus IV. 45 is concerned only with the geographical boundaries of Europe, and Euripides, Androm. 650 () is merely a choice of any two distant spots; note, too, ὑπρ, which differentiates this from Isth. II. 42 and recalls rather Isth. VI. 23 () and Bacch. VIII. 41().

^{page 212 note 1} Schröder notes that MS. D has ῥῃσεις for ῥσεις: but as B has ῥσεις, and both MSS. have ῥσις seven words later, ῥῄσεις is no foundation on which to build conjectures.

^{page 212 note 2} Whence κτς came into B is doubtful; it may have been an alteration both in the text and in the scholium for the difficult αὐγς—from which indeed it does not greatly differ palaeo-graphically; or (to reverse a suggestion of Schröder's) it may have crept into the text from a gloss, κτῖνς, on αὐγς.

^{page 213 note 1} For an interesting parallel to this cf. A. B. Cook,Zeus I., p. 361: a coin of Hadrian, minted at Alexandria, whereon Zeus is portrayed with (amongst other attributes) the rays of Helios and the cornucopiae of the Nile.