No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 7 note 1 Confirmed by R. almost exactly, except in 1. 5, where he read 10IC, while I read KOIC.
page 8 note 1 If we can assume that ⋯φιλοτμ⋯θμν could be used in a passive sense in that period.
page 8 note 2 In the edition which lies before me (apud Guil. Laemarium: 1587) the text printed is φιλοτιμηθεῖσαις, but the correction seems necessary, and is assumed in the Latin translation.
page 8 note 3 Published by Mommsen in Hermes xxxii p. 660, and included in part in his Gesammelte Schrifften by O. Hirschfeld, Histor, i p. 560.