Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T08:51:28.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 4 , Issue 6 , June 1890 , pp. 269 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1890

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brgm. Grds., II. §82.

2 Lit. Centralbl. 1888, col. 668.

3 Müller's, Handb. II2. p. 257.Google Scholar

4 4 Other etymologies: (a) ✓ sru Curt. Grdz 5. 353-4; (b) ✓ rug, Kluge, , Etym. Wort. ed. 4, p. 274bGoogle Scholar. I t might also be possible to establish a connection with Greek .

5 There is a variant ruma.

6 Generally equated with the supposed Greek . This I have endeavoured to prove non-existent (Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. III. 94).

7 This originated, I think, with Pott.