No CrossRef data available.
page 394 note 1 With Ven. II and Vat. Δ but these, at least in the Philebus, are demonstrably copied from B.
page 394 note 2 It seems to be assumed that the φ⋯σιν of ‘γσΞCH’ is merely a corruption. The readings of T (the original of these MSS.) in the Philebus are as yet unpublished, but I am in a position to state that it has φ⋯σιν quite unmistakably.—J.B.