No CrossRef data available.
page 133 note 1 Alex. ap. Athen. 74 E–F=Meineke F.C.G. iii. 468 f.
page 133 note 2 Istr. ap. Athen. 74 E=Müller F.H.G. i. 423.
page 133 note 3 Plut. v. Sol. 24.
page 133 note 4 Et. mag. 733, 42 ff. s.v. , Et. Gud. 514, 22 ff. s.v. , Suid. s.v., Phot. lex. s.v. , Bekk. anecd. 304. 30 ff. s.v. , schol. Ar. Plut. 31, Eust. Od. 1495, 16 f.
page 133 note 5 Philomn. ap. Athen. 74 E = Müller F.H.G. iv. 477.
page 133 note 6 Suid. s.v. .
page 134 note 1 Schol. Ar. Plut. 31, Philemon s.v. σνκασ (cited by Boissonade on Philostr. her. p. 320).
page 134 note 2 There was at Athens a suburb called , where Demeter first bestowed a fig-tree on the hero Phytalos. The fruit of this tree was believed to be the earliest example of cultivated fruit and was named (sic), presumably because a cake of it called was carried in the procession of the Plynteria (Paus. I. 37. 2, Philostr. v. soph. 2. 20. 3, Athen. 74 D , Et. mag. 418, 49 ff. s.v. , Eust. Od. 1399, 29 ff. , ib. 1964, II ff. , Hesych. and Phot. lex. s.v. , Hesych. s.v., Phot. lex. s.v. i. See also W. Judeich Topographie von Athen München 1905 p. 164).
page 134 note 3 Eust. Od. 1572, 56 f. Cp. the myth of Zeus and the Titan Σνκɛ⋯ς (Steph. Byz. s.v. Συκí, Athen. 78 A — B).
page 134 note 4 Roscher, Lex. Myth. ii. 2558 ff.Google Scholar, cp. Athen. 78 c.
page 134 note 5 Hesych. s.v. Σνκετης. Dionysos discovered the fig-tree (Sosib. ap. Athen. 78 c, Et. mag. 455, 30). See further Hesych. s.v. .
page 134 note 6 Athen. 78 c a Laconian cult, cp. Wide, S.Lakonische Kulte p. 166 ft.Google Scholar
page 134 note 7 Athen. 78 c a Naxian cult.
page 134 note 8 Hesych., Phot, and Suid. s.v. .
page 134 note 9 Theocr. ep. 4. 2, Anth. Plan. 240. 1 ff. Philippos, 241. I ff. Argentarius, Hor. Sat. 1. 8. 1 ff.
page 134 note 10 Ar. pax 1164 ff.
page 134 note 11 Lyd. de ost. 45, cp. Plut. symp. 4. 2. 1, 5. 9.
page 134 note 12 Supra n. 3.
page 134 note 13 Mommsen, A.Feste der Stadt Athen2 Leipzig 1898 p. 468 ff.Google Scholar
page 134 note 14 Mommsen ib. p. 458 f.
page 134 note 15 Nilsson, M. P.Griechische Feste Leipzig 1906 p. 129 ff.Google Scholar
page 134 note 16 Theocr. 10. 45 with schol. Cp. Zenob. 3. 44, Macar. 7. 82 f., 88.
page 134 note 17 See Steph. Thes. s.v.φ⋯ντης.
page 134 note 18 L. and S. s.v. τνκοφ⋯ντης.
page 134 note 19 Ib.
page 134 note 20 Boissonade's ed. of Philostr. her. Paris 1806, p. 320.
page 134 note 21 Jahn, O. ‘Über den Aberglauben des bösen Blicks bei den Alten’ in the Berichte über die Verhandlungen der königlich sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Philologisch historische Classe. 1855 p. 80 f.Google Scholar, Sittl, C.Die Gebärden der Griechen und Römer Leipzig 1890 pp. 102 f.Google Scholar, 123, Elworthy, F. T.The Evil Eye London 1895 p. 255 ff.Google Scholar
page 135 note 1 Reproduced from O. Jahn op. cit. pl. 4, 9, p. 81, cp. C. Sittl op. cit. p. 123 fig. 7.
page 135 note 2 Reproduced from O. Jahn op. cit. pi. 5, 2, p. 41 n. 44 c, p. 81 n. 221, cp. Daremberg-Saglio Dict, ant. i. 257 fig. 310, Baumeister Denkm. i. 76 fig. 76.
page 135 note 3 For the photograph from which this cut is taken I am indebted to the courtesy of Mr. R. A. Smith.
page 135 note 4 Th. Echtermeyer Proben aus einer Abhandlung über Namen und symbolische Bedeutung der Finger bei den Griechen und Römern Halle 1835 p. 32 f.
page 135 note 5 Ov.fast. 5. 433 f.
page 135 note 6 C. Sittl op. cit. p. 123.
page 135 note 7 Id. ib.
page 135 note 8 F. T. Elworthy op. cit. p. 256.
page 135 note 9 Littré, E.Dictionnaire de la langue francaise Paris 1863 i. 2. 1669a.Google Scholar
page 135 note 10 Th. Echtermeyer op. cit. p. 32, F. T. Elworthy op. cit. p. 257 n. 404 ff., Körting, G.Lateinisch romanisches Wörterbuch Paderborn 1901 no. 3730.Google Scholar
page 136 note 1 G. Körting id., cp. V. A. Huber Skizzen aus. Spanien Göttingen 1828–1833 p. 263.
page 136 note 2 C. Sittl op. cit. p. 103.
page 136 note 3 Th. Echtermeyer op. cit. p. 32, Flügel, F.Deutschenglisches Wörterbuch Brunswick 1894 s.vGoogle Scholar. ‘Feige.’
page 136 note 4 C. Sittl op. cit. p. 103 n. 6.
page 136 note 5 See O. Jahn op. cit. p. 80 f., C. Sittl op. cit. p. 102 f., É Littré op. cit. p. 1669a, G. Körting op. cit. no. 3730.
page 136 note 6 Mart. ep. 1. 65. 4, 4. 52. 2, C.l.L. iv. 1820.
page 136 note 7 Mart. ep. 7. 71. I ff., carm. Priap. 41. 4, 50. 2.
page 136 note 8 Mart. ep. 12. 33. 2.
page 136 note 9 Juv. 2. 13, Mart. ep. 12. 96. 10.
page 136 note 10 Ar. pax 1350 with schol., Anth. Plan. 240. 7 f. Philippos, 241. 5 Argentarius. 11 Archil, ap. Athen. 594 D, Ar. eccl. 707 ff.
page 136 note 12 Stratt. ap. Athen. 592 D, Hesych. s.v .
page 136 note 13 Schol. Theocr. 5. 114, where Ahrens reads for the vulg. : schol. Ambros. 222 (k.) has .
page 136 note 14 Plat. com. and Menand. ap. Suid. s.v. and ap. Et. mag. 733, 48 ff. s.v. .
page 136 note 15 Dem. de or. 242.
page 136 note 16 Since the foregoing article was completed I have seen that C. Sittl, after indicating the phallic character of die Feige, remarks in a foot-note (op. cit. p. 103 n. 1): ‘Es müsste denn sein, dass eigentlich bedeutete’. This in part anticipates my conclusions.
Parallels, more or less close, to the history of the word might be made out in the case of , and the like.