No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
1 ‘Petronius in the Mediaeval Florilegia’, C.Ph. xxv (1930), 11–21Google Scholar; ‘The Text of Petronius in the Sixteenth Century’, ibid. 128–54.
2 Sage, E. T., ‘The Text-Tradition of Petronius—Preliminary Paper’, A.J.P. 1 (1929)Google Scholar; Daschbach, Mildred, ‘Sambucus and the Text of Petronius’, Abstract of Thesis, University of Pittsburgh Bulletin, vii (1931), 42–44Google Scholar; Sage, E. T., ‘Scaliger and the Text of Petronius’, T.A.P.A. lxiv (1933), pp. xlvii–xlviiiGoogle Scholar; Dorothy J. Fulmer, ‘Cuiacius and the Text of Petronius’, ibid, p. lx; H. R. Milar, N. M. Miller, L. A. White, ‘Three New MSS. of Petronius’, ibid., p. lxi; Adelaide J. Wegner, ‘The Sources of the Petronius Poems in the Catalecta of Scaliger’, ibid., p. lxvii; Milar, H. R., ‘The Inter-relations of MSS. AEFU of Petronius’, Abstract of Thesis, University of Pittsburgh Bulletin, ix (1933), 189–196Google Scholar; N. M. Miller, ‘The Inter-relations of MSS. GDGJKQ. of Petronius’, Abstract of Thesis, ibid., pp. 203–9; Goff, W., ‘A Study of the MSS. NG of Petronius’, Abstract of Thesis, University of Pittsburgh Bulletin, xi (1935), 253–254Google Scholar; Fulmer, D. J., ‘The Tornaesius Edition of Petronius’, Abstract of Thesis, University of Pittsburgh Bulletin, xii (1936), 97–104Google Scholar; Lois M. Beatty, ‘The Bellum civile of Petronius in the Editions of Sambucus, Scaliger and Stephanus’, Abstract of Thesis, ibid., p. 282; Foster, J. H., ‘The cena Trimalchionis of Petronius in the codex Traguriensis’, Abstract of Thesis, University of Pittsburgh Bulletin, xiv (1938), 86–91Google Scholar. I list these works of Sage and his pupils in full because although many of them are little known and not easily accessible, they represent a not inconsiderable contribution to our knowledge of the evidence for the text of Petronius. They are nowhere mentioned by Müller.
3 One, Vat. lat. 11428, was already known to Sage and his pupils. It is mentioned by Fulmer, , University of Pittsburgh Bulletin, xii (1936), 100Google Scholar, who suggests that it may be the ‘fragmentum’ mentioned by Tornaesius.