Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:19:08.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ΣϒN ∏οʌʌωi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

R. M. Rattenbury
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , May 1927 , pp. 53 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 53 note 1 Taurinensis Graecus, B. III. 29.

page 53 note 2 Parisini Graeci 2904, 2906, and 2907.

page 53 note 3 Laurentianus Graecus 36.

page 54 note 1 Hirschig, (Erotici Scriptores, p. 394) prints a different conjecture of his own.Google Scholar

page 54 note 2 The value of M is overestimated in Class. Quart., loc. cit. A complete collation has shown that it is extremely erratic.

page 54 note 3 For evidence for the families see Class. Quart., loc. cit.