¹ But no emendations. Francius was prolific in these, and thereby incurred the heavy sarcasms of Spalding. Perhaps they were known to Burman via another item in the Francius catalogue, no. 751, the Quintilian ‘P. Aerodii Paris. 1563 cum not. mss. viri docti’, or 837, the Leyden edition of 1665 ‘cum plur. annot. mss. P.F,’

² One point is cleared up by my disinde covery. At v. 14. 10 Burman quotes the Codex Aim. as omitting quod intenditur, as H does not (see my previous article). In fact, Stephanus omitted the words, and Francius (and doubtless Almeloveen also) inserted them from H thus: ∧ quod intenditur C. Burman's, then, is the error. He took this to mean that the codex omitted the words. In fact, it included them.