Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T10:17:45.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MONUMENTAL MYTHOGRAPHY - R.L. Fowler Early Greek Mythography. Volume 1: Text and Introduction. Pp. xlviii + 459. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Cased, £155, US$225. ISBN: 978-0-19-814740-4. - R.L. Fowler Early Greek Mythography. Volume 2: Commentary. Pp. xxii + 825. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Cased, £160, US$250. ISBN: 978-0-19-814741-1.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Sara Chiarini
Sara Chiarini*
Affiliation:
Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , October 2015 , pp. 335 - 338
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 D. Felton labels vol. 1 a collection of writers of ‘myth as history’ (BMCR 2002.06.02). A. Bernabé talks of ‘a thematic anthology’ (Gnomon 75.8 [2003], 728).

2 M. Giangiulio, ‘Ippi di Regio, la Suda e l'erudizione pinacografica antica (FGrHist 554 T 1 = Suda, ι591 Adler)’, in S. Alessandri (ed.), Ἱστορίη: studi offerti dagli allievi a Giuseppe Nenci in occasione del suo settantesimo compleanno (1994), pp. 225–43.

3 There is no risk of the mythological commentary being criticised by any sensible reader, whereas there is a feeling of unease, which also emerges from the reviews to volume 1, regarding the alphabetical arrangement in the edition of the fragments. Would not a tentative chronological arrangement have better matched the asserted aim of showing the evolution of the genre, especially given F.'s criticism of Jacoby on this very issue (1: pp. xxix–xxx)?

4 The book is not geared for this task, not least because the fragments edited in volume 1 are a selection of those transmitted from the 29 authors, limited to the ones with a mythical subject. Thus, the portrayals of the mythographers cannot (and do not aim to) be complete.

5 The jarring data on these people induce F. to interpret them as the embodiment of the ancestral, pre-Greek people par excellence in the imagination of the Greeks and to reject the search for their localisation (2: pp. 84–96).

6 F. continues: ‘“Myths” were becoming “myth”, no longer organically linked with other things, but a kind of discourse in its own right’. Whatever F. intends by ‘other things’, myth still permeated many moments in the life of a fifth-century Greek citizen.

7 A. Bernabé, op. cit., 728–31; V. Liapis, CR 52.2 (2002), 236–8. Another minor objection by Bernabé concerns Chreophylus' fr. 3 (1: p. 66), which may be alternatively assigned to the homonymous epic poet from Samos. F. replies to this point and defends his attribution to the Ephesian prose writer (2: p. 232 n. 102).

8 These are taken into account within the mythological commentary which, as said, does not rely only on early mythographic sources.