No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 Mr Merrill's dependence on Ellis is almost ludicrous. 64 23 ‘ dein spatium quinquaginta fere litterarum (Ell.)’: our informant is Keil, and Ellis merely substituted a round number for Keil's ‘ quadragomta octo ’. When Ellis appropriates the conjectures of others, 31 5, 55 9, 64 273, 350, Mr Merrill repeats the false ascription