Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:10:27.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Life of Aristotle and the Composition and Structure of the Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Ernest Barker
Affiliation:
Cambridge.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 163 note 1 I am assuming the existence of a general, if loose, unity in Books I–III.

page 164 note 1 Attention was drawn to this fact in the writer's Greek Political Theory (1918), pp. 380–381.

page 164 note 2 At the same time it is to be noted that, in the eleventh chapter, Aristotle finds room, in an aporetic manner, for the principle of popular government.

page 165 note 1 Parts of the Laws, or even the whole, may have been circulated, in some form, at an earlier date.

page 169 note 1 Jaeger, W., Aristoteles, p. 302.Google Scholar

page 170 note 1 Op. cit. Introduction, p. xxii.

page 172 note 1 It may be of service to the reader if the following list of books and articles dealing with the composition and structure of the Politics is appended. Jaeger, W., Aristoteles (1923)Google Scholar: Part I, c. i and especially c. iv on the Protrepticus; Part II, c. i and especially c. vi on Urpolitik; Part III, c. i and c. ii. Jaeger, W., Aristotle's Politics (Hibbert Journal, January, 1927)Google Scholar. von Arnim, H., Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Aristotelischen Politik (1924Google Scholar — a paper originally communicated to the Vienna Academy of Sciences, October, 1923). Stocks, J. L., The Composition of Aristotle's Politics (Classical Quarterly, 1927, Vol XXI, pp. 177187)Google Scholar. The writer would draw particular attention to Professor Stocks' paper, which proceeds by a different method — that of detailed textual criticism.