^{page 162 note 1} C.R., 1924, p. 60. An improved text of the inscription is now available in Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum, vol. i., pp. 33–37.

^{page 162 note 2} Rivista di Filologia, 192.4, p. 80 ff.

^{page 162 note 3} In 11. 21 ff. I would read .

^{page 163 note 1} Willems, , Le Sénai, II., pp. 156–157 and 1–3Google Scholar.

^{page 163 note 2} Plutarch, Lucullus, ch. ii.

^{page 163 note 3} Levi makes out a good case against Cuq in retaining 74 B.C. as the date of the formal annexation of Cyrene. But he does not meet Cuq's other arguments.

The case of Cyrene may be compared with that of Cilicia, which received visits from Roman officials ever-since 102 B.C., but was not definitely annexed till 78–76 B.C.

^{page 163 note 4} Bevan, , The House of Seleucus, II., p. 263Google Scholar.

^{page 164 note 1} Cf. the agrarian law of Rullus, which was drafted in December 64.

^{page 164 note 2} De lmperio Cn. Pompeii, §§ 34–35.

^{page 164 note 3} Groebe (Klip, X., p. 374, n. 1) suggests January 67. This may well have been the date of the formal enactment.