^{page 309 note 1} Annales d'histoire économique et sociale, ii (1930), 387 ff. A recent view of the function of Annales is Ch. Morazé's address to the Institute of Contemporary History, published in its journal and in Annales, xxiii 1968), 233 ff.

^{page 309 note 2} School? ‘Aux Annales il n'y a que des historiens … L'ésprit des Annales? Je le souhaite. L'école des Annales, non pas, certes’ (Febvre, Annales, vi [1951], 543).

^{page 310 note 1} Cf. my forthcoming review of Aymard's Études d'histoire ancienne in Rivista Storica Italiana.

^{page 310 note 2} On Vernant's ideas there is the critique of E.-A. Lévy-Valensi, Annales, xx (1965), 923 ff.

^{page 310 note 3} Braudel opened the debate on Lévi-Strauss in Annales, xiii (1958), 725 ff.; but Dumézil had long been a contributor, and the essential sympathy of Annales for such approaches was already explained by Febvre, vi (1951), 345 ff.; viii (1953), 67 ff. Since 1964 the debate on Lévi-Strauss has been continuous: xix (1964), 1085 ff.; xx (1965), 62 ff., 547 ff.; xxi (1966), 71 ff.; xxii (1967), 792 ff.

^{page 310 note 4} Cf. Braudel's, remarks on ‘le rôle d'avant-garde des études consacrées à I'antiquité classique’, Annales, xiii (1958), 729Google Scholar. On F. Lot and Annales, cf. Braudel and J. Le Goff, xxi (1966), 1177 ff.

^{page 310 note 5} Febvre, , Annales, ix (1954), 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar ff.; cf. also Braudel's general introduction in A. Varagnac (ed.), L'homme avant écriture (1959).

^{page 310 note 6} On Berr cf. Febvre's, address, Annales, vii (1952), 289Google Scholar ff, and the announcement of his death, x (1955), 1 f.; for his influence on Annales cf. Braudel's articles on Bloch and Febvre in the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences ii. 92 ff.; v. 348 ff.

^{page 311 note 1} Its vices have been well characterized by Cobb, Richard, A Second Identity (1969), 76 ff.Google Scholar