Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:41:51.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ibis - Jacques André: Ovide, Contre Ibis. (Collection des Universités de France.) Pp. xliv + 64 [4–31 double]. Paris: ‘Les Belles Lettres’, 1963. Paper, 7.50 fr.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

E. J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 287 note 1 Can one insist on ‘concordances for-melles’ (p. vi) between Tr. i. 6. 13 (nescioquis) and Ibis 9 (quisquis is est)?

page 287 note 2 André does not interpret modo at v. 56 ‘metre’; but cf. C.R. Ixxiii (1959), 39.Google Scholar

page 288 note 1 TGPp (= La Penna's P1) V; FH cited intermittently. La Penna's conclusions on the tradition are in the main accepted by André.

page 288 note 2 At 189–90, Heinsius' palmary Teorum … sontibus having been given, we do not require to be told that it was accepted by ‘Bährens, Ehwald–Levy’—unequal yokemates!—for the information adds nothing to the merits of the conjecture.

page 288 note 3 The latter may be illustrated from the list of sigla on pp. 1–2, which yields the following: ‘Philippicus’—spelt correctly by La Penna; ‘bibl. Com. Leicester’ [incorrect now in any case], ‘in editione 1590’, ‘XII° s.’ [very odd syntax, this], ‘XIIe s.’; ‘Myrcilli’ for ‘Mycilli’; and so on.