^{page 318 note 1} Justinian's Novellae show the vast swarm of officials attached e.g. to St. Sophia.

^{page 318 note 2} Steinthal's ‘Flexionsschema’ is not an adequate version, I believe.

^{page 318 note 3} Cf. Steinthal, p. 433.

^{page 319 note 1} Cf. Dionysius Thrax, cap. 15.

^{page 319 note 2} It may be well to remember that our ‘conjugation’ has developed a somewhat different, really a narrower sphere than σνζγία. cf. K. E. A. Schmidt, Beiträge, p. 364.

^{page 319 note 3} Cf. G. Curtius, das verbum der Griechischen Sprache, 2 ed. 1877, I. p. 101. The credit of pointing out the matter belongs to Elmsley on Aristoph. Acharn. 741.

^{page 319 note 4} For which the technical term was ἀσυνταΞία.

^{page 320 note 1} Cf. also Apollonius, Syntax 251, 16.

^{page 320 note 2} The general reader will remember that the μετοχὴ was a separate part of speech.

^{page 321 note 1} The recent publication of Prof. H. W. Smyth's great work on the Ionic dialect will add especial interest to this part of Hilgard's index.

^{page 321 note 2} ὑυονα πράγνατος. The use of πρᾶγνα for πρᾶξιsigmav; is a peculiarity of the technical language of the grammarians from Dionysius Thrax on.

^{page 321 note 3} Cf. Schoemann, Redetheile, p. 216 sq.