^{page 140 note 1} The same applies to the assumption of achaplology at Lucilius 123 inde Diciarchitum populos. Dicarchitum is to be read; cf. Marx ad loc.

^{page 140 note 2} Hainsworth says that the haplology here is ‘generally accepted’. It is not accepted in the excellent (and only) modern commentary on the poem, that of C. F. Russo.

^{page 141 note 1} The facts are given by Chantraine, i. 84–85.