Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:15:29.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

H. J. Lorenz: De Pseudo-Antonii Musae et Pseudo-Apulei genere dicendi. (Bonn diss.) Pp. 142. Bonn: privately printed, 1961. Paper.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

R. Browning
Affiliation:
University College London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 351 note 1 On the history of the Greek, Latin, and vernacular Herbals in Europe, cf. Singer, C., ‘The Herbal in Antiquity and its Transmission to later Ages’, J.H.S. xlvii (1927), 152Google Scholar. The texts of Ps.-Apuleius and Ps.-Antonius Musa are edited by Howard, E. and Sigerist, H. E. in vol. iv of the Corpus Medicorum Latinorum, Leipzig, 1927.Google Scholar

page 351 note 2 Singer, op. cit., was wrong on this point. The correct conclusion was drawn by Sigerist, H. E., ‘Zum Herbarius Pseudo-Apulei’, Archiv für Geschichte der Medizin, xxiii (1930), 197204Google Scholar. The question turns on a number more or less verbatim citations from Pliny's Natural History.