No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 Why is R. said to have been magister officiorum ‘à une époque inconnue’ (p. vi)? The correction of Namatius (Cod. Theod. 6. 27. 15) to Namatianus is generally accepted and was so in V.'s early edition (p. 171). This correction, supplying the date 412, might at least have been mentioned.
2 All references but those accompanied by II are made to bk. I.
3 Why always referred to, except in the preface, as that of 1905?