Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T16:08:23.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The First Editor of Lucretius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A. E. Housman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , September 1928 , pp. 122 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Except indeed that the thesaurus cites Afran. fr. com. 290 ‘adducor ferre (with the false information “iexocodd.”) humana humaniexamples tus’ and Varr. r.r. II 7 9 ‘equus matrem salire cum adduci non posset’, and supposes that these also are examples of ‘ace. c. inf.’

2 Of the three examples cited there by Mr A. S. Pease one, pro Mil. 35, is different (causal) and the two others are simply false.

3 This is also the opinion of Diels, to whom therefore, and not to Madvig, it will henceforth be attributed. Editors of Lucretius neglect Madvig, and his corrections of III 793 and V 122 f. (published in 1843) and of V 979 are usually ignored or ascribed to others.