Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:00:04.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Double Recension in the Poems of Prudentius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1903

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 204 note 1 The following abbreviations of the titles of MSS. will be found—some from Dresael's edition, some from my own collations :— Put. = Paris Lat. 8688 ; a = Vat. 3859 ; o = Alex. 58 A = Guelferbyt; R=Rottendorp ; i = Alex. 348 ; p = Alex. 74 ; Prag. = Pragensis ; q = Alex. 1702; u = Urbin 666; m = Vat. 5821 ; P2 = Paris Lat. 8085; P5 = Par. Lat. 8086; P6 = Par. Lat. 8088; P7 =Par. Lat. 8305; P9 =Par. Lat. 8307; K = Köln Dombibl. 81 ; Stutt. = Stuttgart poet in 410. 6 ; B2 =Bern. 394 ; Dnss. = Düsseldorf F. 1 ; O = Bodleian Auct. F. 3, 6 ; N = Nomsianus ; Laur. = Laurentianus ; Ang = Angelicus ; H = Heilsbronnensis (now Bodleian Auct. T. 2, 22); Om = St Omer ; W = Viennensis ; Boh. I = Boheri I (now at Montpelier) ; T = Thuanus (now Paris Lat. 8087); P1 = Paris Lat. 8318.

page 206 note 1 The omission of Per. iv. 102–105 is more difficult, though even that it is not impossible to explain.