^{page 224 note 1} Here, with Ritter, we should except Alföldi.

^{page 225 note 1} Listed in Der König von Frankreich ² (1960), ii. 33 f.; for later studies see p. 6.

^{page 225 note 2} He obviously owes something to S. Grenz, Beiträge zur Geschichte des Diadems in den hellenistischen Reichen (Diss. Greifswald, 1914); the fact that this is not available in England will enhance the value of his work, though it makes it difficult to judge his originality.

^{page 225 note 3} On the problems connected with Greek representations of Persian dress (pp. 14 ff.) see also A. Alföldi, Studies in Honour of A. M. Friend (1955), 15 ff.

^{page 225 note 4}Schweizerisches Archiv für Volkskunde xlvii (1951), 11 ff.; G. Widengren, Hommages à G. Dumézil (1960), 225 ff.; G. Binder, Die Aussetzung des Königskindes Kyros und Romulus (1964), 17 ff., 70 f.; cf. 162 f.: the legend of Sargon king of Accad.

^{page 226 note 1} Rather than A.D. 14. The importance of this consideration is often overlooked: cf. L. Herrman, R.E.A. xxxi (1929), 217 ff.; G. V. Sumner, A.U.M.L.A. xv (1961), 30 ff.

^{page 226 note 2} There is a certain academicism in Ritter's approach; he seems not to have taken account of M. J. Fontana, ‘Le lotte per la successione di Alessandro Magno’ (Atti Acc. Sc. Lett, e Art. Palermo xviii. 2 [1959], 103 ff.), or E. Badian's important review, Gnomon xxxiv (1962), 381 ff. = Studies in Greek and Roman History, 262 ff.

^{page 226 note 3} And later backdated his reign in accordance: Ritter pp. 103 ff.

^{page 226 note 4} This was one of the few occasions when the king allowed himself to be crowned by others: not surprisingly, Antigonus wished to appear to yield to pressure—Ritter's first explanation (pp. 83 f.) is the best.

^{page 227 note 1} For the possibilities here, compare the programme announced in Deutsche Königspfalzen (Max-Planck-Institut für Geschichte xi. 1) i (1963).