No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Date and Occasion of the Pervigilium Veneris
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9479e/9479e943ef8757e91d192520e93b78dd8844ef90" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1938
References
page 110 note 1 All these attempts are discussed by Sir Cecil Clementi in the Introduction to his ‘Pervigilium Veneris’, third edition, 1936.
page 110 note 2 For chronology I rely chiefly upon Groag and Ensslin in R.-E. 16.
page 110 note 3 Klio ii, p. 237.Google Scholar
page 111 note 1 R.-E. xiv 2528, 54 ff. and 2467, 68 ff.
page 111 note 2 Dessau, Inscr. Lat. Sel. i, 672.
page 111 note 3 Our knowledge of Candidianus is wholly wived from De mort.De mort pers.
page 111 note 4 Epit. Aur. Vict. xi. 1 and 18, Zosim. ii. 8. 1: ‘meus affinis’ De mort. pers. 18. 14 must be a loose expression.
page 112 note 1 See Baehrens, , F.P.R. p. 405Google Scholar.