Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:12:01.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Date and Occasion of the Pervigilium Veneris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

D. S. Robertson
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 110 note 1 All these attempts are discussed by Sir Cecil Clementi in the Introduction to his ‘Pervigilium Veneris’, third edition, 1936.

page 110 note 2 For chronology I rely chiefly upon Groag and Ensslin in R.-E. 16.

page 110 note 3 Klio ii, p. 237.Google Scholar

page 111 note 1 R.-E. xiv 2528, 54 ff. and 2467, 68 ff.

page 111 note 2 Dessau, Inscr. Lat. Sel. i, 672.

page 111 note 3 Our knowledge of Candidianus is wholly wived from De mort.De mort pers.

page 111 note 4 Epit. Aur. Vict. xi. 1 and 18, Zosim. ii. 8. 1: ‘meus affinis’ De mort. pers. 18. 14 must be a loose expression.

page 112 note 1 See Baehrens, , F.P.R. p. 405Google Scholar.