No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 90 note 1 Though adopted by Winstedt (Oxford text), whose critical note is inept.
page 91 note 1 For the nature of this work see Schanz-Hosius i4. 332, and literature there cited.
page 91 note 2 e.g. Cic. Att. i. 16. 12 cuius (domi)] eius bN; Cic. Fam. xvi. 23. 2 cuius Mfh: eius D.
page 91 note 3 This is surely true even with the manuscript reading eius.