^{page 356 note 1} Conceivably this was meant for arcum, i.e. n with v written over it.

^{page 356 note 2} Thus, In‘gentem. It is hard to say whether the’, by which the word is converted into mergentem, is original: the ink of it is as black as the rest of the wont.

^{page 356 note 3} Perhaps for clarens?

^{page 356 note 4} Possibly dudai.

^{page 356 note 5} This looks as if the original MS. wrote v for y.

^{page 356 note 6} Perhaps for extrudere, which is written in the right margin.

^{page 357 note 1} This v. is, so far as I have examined, peculiar to M. It seems to mean Tangit et Aurigenam (Perseus) chelarum et summa recidit (or relidit).

^{page 357 note 2} Seems to point to caeruleo uersa speciem mutasse colore.