^{page 108 note 1} Even in the third person, only one author, so far as I know, ever used the perfect subjunctive with caue, and he used it only once in an intensely emotional passage, where the expression involved the escape of a supposed lunatic (Plaut. Men. 994).

^{page 108 note 2} One should be careful not to confuse with prohibitions such expressious as Most. 966 uide ne quopiam deuorteris= ‘I suspect you have been dropping in somewhere,’ lit. ‘see lest you have been dropping in,’ &c. ; see Gilderaleeve-Lodge Grammar, § 548, 4.

^{page 108 note 3} See the review of his article in the American Journal of Philolgy, xxii, 1.

^{page 109 note 1} I have classified this instance correctly in my Studies, p. 216, also in my article on ‘A Neglected Use of the Latin Subjunctive’ in the Classical Review, xii. p. 203.

^{page 109 note 2} See my Studies, pp. 213 ff.

^{page 109 note 3} Haut. 302, 745, 939, Eun. 76, 212, 278, 388, 751, 786, 988, And. 205, 704, 706, 980, Phorm. 419, 993, Ad. 22, 170.