No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
1 The ‘Conclusion’ from which these phrases are taken is headed ‘Ambitions et envergure d'un lyrisme d'integration’.
2 Elegant Variation, against which Quiller-Couch was warning Cambridge undergraduates half a century ago, is found in all its glory: the poet is alternately ‘le Véronais’, ‘le Transpadan’, ‘le Cisalpin’.
3 Acceptance of in ullo does not inevitably entail adding in at 87. 3 (palaeographically very easy: cf. Clausen, A.J.P. lxx [1949], 311; lxxvi [1955], 52), since in at v. 4 may construed ⋯π⋯ κοινοῖ.