Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:45:33.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bucolica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 166 note 1 The aor. φληθεν is paralleled by 15. 100, Ar. Ran. 229, both adduced by Cholmeley.

page 167 note 1 1. 1299, 4. 980, 1694; 1. 1299 without adj. or gen.

page 167 note 2 The hiatus at the weak caesura in 24 is defended by 7. 8, 22. 116, 24. 72.

page 167 note 3 Kühner-Gerth I. 212; Goodwin, , M.T., p. 82Google Scholar; Gildersleeve, , Synt. of Classical Gk., 1. p. 170Google Scholar; Thompson, F. E., Synt. of Attic Gk., p. 272.Google Scholar

page 168 note 1 I cannot agree with Wilamowitz (Textg., p. 228) that two men watching a cow crossing the sea, and Zeus stroking a cow, are well-balanced pendants.

page 169 note 1 Modern editors, except Legrand in the new Budé text, have similarly perverted the sense by punctuation at Theocr. 16. 46.

page 169 note 2 I should accept provisionally 67 ριθμηθεῖσιν (Wilamowitz), 68 θαρσοη (Hermann), 71 γχαλαν (Sitzler).