^{page 338 note 1} Others, e.g. Höffding (Outlines of Psychology, p. 152 ff.), recognise Association of Ideas by Similarity, by External Connection (Contiguity), and by the Relation between the Whole and the Parts—the last method being intermediate between the other two and transitional in character.

^{page 341 note 1} E.g. Weil cj. δ φθορα for δ δονα in 383; Mahaffy.Bury bracket as an interpolation the whole of 383 and the words αἰδώς τε in 385; Hadley athetises 384–387 inclusive, and places 388–390 after 402.

^{page 343 note 1} Hdt. viii. 51 records the Delphic oracle , and the next two chapters tell how the Persians But the connexion between ‘wooden wall’ and ‘conflagration’ is here purely accidental.

^{page 343 note 2} Or perhaps ‘and between (us and death) by way of a thin defence extends a mere wall in breadth.’ Other translations and alterations are possible; but the general sense is clear.

^{page 344 note 1} The word πργων is found seven lines back at 1091; but this is probably accidental.

^{page 344 note 2} Conceivably from the chorus in the Ion 452 ff., where we have μαντενμασι (471) and στδια (497), the latter being brought into connexion with a dance to the music of pipes. But the surviving plays of Euripides are, comparatively, so few that it would be unsafe to dogmatise.

^{page 344 note 3} Cp. Theocr. 28. 29. 30. passim, and some more isolated passages.

^{page 344 note 4} E.g. Alcm. fr. 3 Weir Smyth = Theocr. 1. 30 λιχρσφ, 5. 45 κὐπειρος; Alcm. fr1. 4, 40 f. Theocr. 18. 26 ff.; Alcm. fr. 7 Theocr. 18. 2 παρθενικα of Spartan girls, 28. 7 ἰμεροφώνων of the Graces: Alcm. fr. 26 = Theocr. 7. 157 μκωνας.

^{page 345 note 1} It is just possible that Pindar is here imitating Simonides, not vice versa; see J. Girard in Dar.-sagl. II. i. 241.