^{page 113 note 1} Blackwood's Magazine, December, 1828.

^{page 113 note 2} I say ‘almost’ because the enthymeme of later times was not limited to a syllogism ‘from likelihoods or signs,’ as Cope would of course have limited Aristotle's.

^{page 113 note 3} Ancient Classics for English Readers: Aristotle, p. 81.

^{page 114 note 1} Laws of Thought, pp. 247, 248.

^{page 114 note 2} Rhet., 1. 2. 14.

^{page 114 note 3} V. 10., §§ 1, 2.

^{page 114 note 4} E.g., Whately, Thomson, Jevons, Joseph.

^{page 114 note 5} Or, instead of one premiss, the conclusion may be suppressed.

^{page 114 note 6} Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric, p. 103 and note.

^{page 115 note 1} Logic, by R. F. Clarke, p. 357.

^{page 115 note 2} Rhet. i. 2. 18.

^{page 116 note 1} Classical Review, i., p. 98 f.

^{page 116 note 2} Anal. Post., i. 10. 7.

^{page 117 note 1} Cope, loc. cit., pp. 164, 165 ; Ar. Rhet. i. 2. 18.

^{page 117 note 2} Rhet. ad Alex., c. 10.

^{page 117 note 3} Topica, § 55. See Reid on pro Sulla, § 32.

^{page 118 note 1} V. 10. 1.

^{page 118 note 2} Ed. Vatic, i., p. 141.

^{page 118 note 3} Vol. ii., p. 289.

^{page 118 note 4} Mansel's Aldrich, Appendix F.