^{page 196 note 1} Vahlen, , Opuscula ii (Leipzig, 1908), 271 ff.Google Scholar, says all that need be said in defence of the manuscripts' assignation of λ⋯γε σ⋯ to the same speaker as τ⋯ς οὐν γ⋯νοιτ' ἄν;

^{page 197 note 1} Pohlenz, , N.A.W.G. (Ph.-hist.), 1952, pp. 106 f.Google Scholar, translates ‘Ich habe nicht die geringste Ahnung, was du meinst’, comparing such expressions as Ach. 1035 οὐδ' ἂν στριβιλ⋯κιγξ. Erbse, Eranos, lii (1954), 103, points out that the definite article differentiates τ⋯ θρ⋯ττε from those expressions.

^{page 197 note 2} Aristophanes and Others (London, 1909), p. 13.Google Scholar

^{page 198 note 1} Especially in Hermann, K. F., Progymnsmata ad Aristophanis Equites (Marburg, 1835).Google Scholar