^{page 79 note 1} Misprinted by Cichorius on p. 33: see pp. 97, 101. Judeich accents Μανωλήδος, taking it as for iS Μανωλήδος.

^{page 79 note 2} I took it as meaning ‘woman of Motala or Motala,’ used as a personal name (like Lydia, &c). For a good example of an ethnic turned into a proper name see Μαγ⋯δ[ος] or Μαγδ[ɛ⋯ς] in a Termessian inscription B.C.H. 1899, p. 174, no. 21.

^{page 81 note 1} Wrongly referred to as No, 80 on p. 32. NO. CXX, VOI,. XIV.

^{page 81 note 2} The inscription belongs to Laoonia, and an awkward arrangement in the Corpus has led hasty readers to connect it with the wrong number and so class it to Hierapolis.

^{page 82 note 1} It evidently reached Mm after his commentary was in great part written, but in time to be taken notice of in several cases, and sometimes at considerable length (p. 75).

^{page 83 note 1} No. 292 follows 291 immediately, on the same stone and the same side of it.

^{page 83 note 1} Specimens are given on p. 315; but I had prepared many more, which would have taken up too much space.

^{page 83 note 2} See Sterrett, Epigr. Journey, No. 53, 05, 34, 37.

^{page 83 note 3} On this epithet see an earlier paragraph.

^{page 83 note 4} The copy has P, an obvious mistake for B.

^{page 83 note 5} There is a fault in Dr. Judeich's report of the epigraphic text of this name: he omits N. After the name the copyist inserts E by another mistake : the copy is full of mistakes, and some passages are hopeless. Dr. Judeich takes E as wrongly copied for B, and therefore forces BTOR into line 1, where there is no space for it.

^{page 84 note 1} Judeich reads Πνλνᾰ, while he was under the herrschende Meinung that δς must refer to the following name (which in that case must be in the genitive here): I read an accusative like Wadd. 656 (quoted in next paragraph).

^{page 84 note 2} Παιτιαν⋯ν 656, Παιτιαν⋯ν 649 : one or other is an error : 11 aud IT are easily confused.

^{page 92 note 1} Athenaeum, 2 Dec. 1890; cf. Berl. Phil. Woch. 9 Dec.

^{page 92 note 2} ibid. 16 Dec.

^{page 92 note 3} Alhen. Mitheil. xxiv. (1899) p. 357, ff

^{page 92 note 4} Daily News, 10 Jan. 1900.