Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T04:17:58.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agrippa's Response to paul

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. E. Harry
J. E. Harry
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 22 , Issue 8 , December 1908 , pp. 238 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 239 note 1 Let a few suffice: Plut. Pericles 159 F , Coriol. 217 F , Mar. 427 A , Crass. 547 C, Polyb. 10. 18, Appian, Mithrid. 330, Themistius 11. 143 C, Eustath. Il. β p. 339. 18 .

page 241 note 1 Wetstenius, Kuinoel, Neander, de Wette, Lange, Robinson, Hackett, Conybeare.

page 241 note 2 Valla, Luther, Beza, Grotius, Castalio, Du Veil, Bengel, Stier.

page 241 note 3 Oecumenius, Olshausen, Baumgarten, Meyer, Lechler.

page 241 note 4 It is worthy of note that so many scholars unconsciously betray their dissatisfaction with πε⋯θεις by discarding the idea it involves, to a certain extent, and introducing another word to express the main idea (something which translates ) whenever they attempt to paraphrase the passage.

page 241 note 5 Kritisch-Exegetisches Handbuch über die Apostelgeschichte.