No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 164 note 1 Mr. Thomson meets this difficulty by suggesting πντων μετασχὼν δ τετολμηκώς τ' μο, which is attractive (or, alternatively, στα τολμσας: but I doubt δτα): but objection (I) remains.
page 165 note 1 I had overlooked E. Supp. 908; ‘i.e. δκαιον,’ Murray: but both reading and interpretation seem to me highly doubtful (see Grégoire in the Budé edition).